Thursday, December 16, 2010

Important Energy Policy News


Ok, I realize I am already breaking my promise to have a more "balanced" approach to sustainability, but Solar Nation just sent this update on new and pending policy developments that warrants attention.

Per Solar Nation, the solar Department of Energy Treasury Grant Program (TGP) looks like it will be extended beyond this year through to 2011, thereby continuing momentum in commercial adoption of solar energy. This will help stabilize the solar industry and assist in further job creation. All good!

It also looks like a national energy policy, albeit a tweaked version, is still on the horizon. Compromise seems to be the new norm (and perhaps a dirty word) in legislation. As an advocate, I care less about how we get there then the fact that we do get there. For example, while nuclear energy is controversial, as there are security and by-product concerns, you can't argue the fact that it produces clean energy. In addition, many European countries have successfully added nuclear to their energy mix. So, if it's added to the energy mix we should go forward and put our scientist to work in finding creative, more viable solutions for dealing with nuclear waste.

Looks like the lame duck Congress isn't so lame.

This might be the best Christmas ever!

Paula

Monday, December 13, 2010

Itron's Philip Mezey on growing smart grid | Intelligent Utility

Itron's Philip Mezey on growing smart grid Intelligent Utility

Many of us who worked in in the telecom industry during it's hayday in the late 80's-90's see some interesting parallels between the telecom industry pre-post 1983 deregualation and the evolving energy industry. Prior to deregulation, the telecom industry operated as a series of local monopolies with little to no competition. Prices were high, products were limited, service was fair.

In a post-deregulation telecom environment competition thrived, prices fell significantly and new services were added to provide greater choice, functionality and flexibility. With the on-set of a smart-grid infrastructure, where consumers can better manage their appliances, HVAC systems and equipment, as well as chose their desired utility for electric production, we will see a big shift in the operation of utility companies.

How and when this all shakes out is still up for debate, but some states, like Texas and California, aren't waiting. This article talks to the future of the smart-grid.

Best,

Paula

Sunday, December 12, 2010

How States Lead the Way | RenewablesBiz

How States Lead the Way RenewablesBiz

With our nation's "lame duck" session in full-force, it's hard to see any forward policy movement ahead of us. This recent analysis
believes the country's energy policy will continue to unfold on a state-by-state basis. While I'm pleased that my fair state of NJ is within
the "Top 10" list of states leading the way on clean energy policy, I am very concerned that NJ's budgetary woes will continue
to shift funding, and perhaps policy, away from a solid, long-term vision for clean energy.

Case and point, NJ's solar rebate program is now over. Perhaps the fact that solar installations have doubled over the past year
have influenced this decision. Perhaps it was strictly a reflection of NJ's financial condition. Either way, time will tell how this decision impacts future solar installations.

Best,

Paula

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Eat Green-Benefits of supporting local farmers

Some friends convinced me to split a "farm share" with them this summer. As a budding sustainability enthusiast, and a bit of a health nut, I liked the idea of eating more locally grown organic produce without having to make a big investment. The 3-way split cost us $176 each which roughly equated to $7.30/week for the 6 months growing session. A bargain for organic fresh produce, fruit and flowers!!!

But the financial benefits were minor in relation to the culinary, social and health benefits we received from buying local produce. Over the course of the 6 months we
experimented with new, and sometimes exotic produce, like Kobolini, a broccoli-like root that is delicious when stemmed then tossed with olive oil and garlic. (What isn't?!) My family even developed a new appreciation for kale and bok choy, again sauteing them with olive oil and garlic or mixing them with soy sauce and other veggies to form the stuffing for spring rolls. Absolutely delicious!!!

We loved the routine of going to the farm and picking out our weekly fresh produce, herbs and flowers. It was a great social experience, both with our respective family members (my son loved picking the berries, but hated picking beans!), my friends (who thought it was fun until 90+ degree weather set in!) and our extended new family-the farm manager and seasonal helpers (who gave us picking and cooking tips). We developed a strong bond and a deeply rooted commitment to living off the land, that is, as much as a suburban family can live off the land!

Most importantly, the quality of the produce was phenomenal. Initially it seemed strange to be picking up dirty, small produce (and it was!), but the benefits out-weighed the extra work. The taste of fresh, farm-picked, organic produce far exceeded anything we've gotten from a traditional grocery store.  The beets and sweet potatoes were sweeter and the greens more flavorful.  Better still, we knew that the food we were eating was produced without harmful or unnatural chemicals, so we were eating healthier.

It was sad saying goodbye to our friends at the farm when the season ended before Thanksgiving.  Being a part of a farm share was a fantastic experience. It also felt great knowing this simple and rewarding experience helped support local farming, reduced gas emissions and allowed us to eat healthier-all for the reasonable price of $7.30/week!  That's what I call sustainability at it's best!

Seasons Greetings!

Paula

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Solar Tax Grants-Pleading for a Cash Grant Extension | RenewablesBiz

Pleading for a Cash Grant Extension RenewablesBiz (Click for additional Details)

There's no doubt over the effectiveness of the Federal Government's solar energy "Tax Grant" program. The grants provide a 30% reimbursement to businesses off their gross solar system costs. Tax Grants differ from Tax Credits in that they are paid out within approximately 60 days of signing a solar energy contract. This near-term reimbursement is critical to businesses, especially in a weak economy, as it helps them with their cash-flow.

Please contact your local representatives and ask them to continue their support of Section 1603 Grants. Another 2 years will allow the solar industry to continue it's progress in saving companies millions in energy costs, increasing energy independence and greening the nation.

Best,

Paula

Friday, November 12, 2010

Utilities Moving into Solar Markets | RenewablesBiz

NJ has over 300 solar energy installers operating within the state. Many of these are small businesses that have started from construction or roofing backgrounds. I have often wondered how this
mix will change as the solar market matures and technology improves solar-energy's efficiency ratings. I've also wondered, as I've looked around at all of the PSE&G panels on telephone poles, how the market will change should the utilities make a bigger play in the solar market.

Utilities Moving into Solar Markets RenewablesBiz provides some insight into the changes brought on by the utilities moving into solar markets.

Best,

Paula

Monday, November 8, 2010

Environment NJ's position on National Energy Policy

As a long-time supporter of Environment NJ, I am consistently impressed with the advocacy work they do for the residents of NJ. With their help we have achieved one of the most ambitious state carbon reduction programs in the nation. In addition, they have helped keep our priceless coastal waters clean and safe.  I am therefore happy to share their insight on the need for a national energy policy and their concerns over the recent electoral changes.

Best,

Paula

Excerpt from email update:
As you know, Environment New Jersey endorsed Reps. John Adler, Rush Holt and Frank Pallone in Tuesday's election because of their excellent environmental voting records.

We're happy to congratulate Reps. Holt and Pallone on their victories. But we're also disappointed that Rep. Adler will not be serving the 3rd Congressional District in south Jersey.

What do these results, and the rest of Tuesday's election returns, mean for the places we're working to protect and the environmental values that so many of us share?
New Jersey has a big stake in -- and a deep need for -- national leadership on the environment. For years, when the federal government would not lead, New Jersey moved ahead with strong environmental programs to clean up air pollution, protect waterways and expand clean energy and global warming solutions.

But there's a limit to what New Jersey, or any one state alone, can do to solve large environmental problems of national and global significance. When it comes to air pollution, healthy oceans, and solving global warming, no man -- or state -- is an island. Before the world can take timely action on climate change, our nation must step up to the plate and adopt our own program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Moreover, New Jersey's ability to harness the huge potential for clean, renewable energy off our coast sits in the hands of the federal government. So does the protection of our coasts from oil and gas drilling. And, the Barnegat Bay at the Jersey Shore, which is choking on pollution left unchecked by outdated stormwater drains and sewer infrastructure, can only be saved through a strong partnership between our state and federal government.

In Washington, D.C., the U.S. House will have a new speaker who, in our view, is no friend of the environment. The leadership of key House committees will be turned over to politicians who are more closely allied than their predecessors with the oil and coal industries, as well as other interests that seek greater access to our public lands, fewer limits on air and water pollution, and a head-in-the-sand approach to clean energy and global warming.

Yet we hope the new powers that be in Washington will think twice before doing the bidding of Big Oil or other polluting industries. The vast majority of us still want more clean energy, not less. The vast majority of us still support sensible steps to limit carbon pollution. The vast majority of us still want to see our national parks, national forests and great waterways protected and preserved. And, of course, all of us need clean air to breathe and safe water to drink.

In the next few days and weeks, we will urge the outgoing Congress to act on long overdue measures to promote renewable energy and protect public lands. If members of either party reach across the aisle to win bipartisan support for these or other positive steps on the environment, we'll be the first to support them. But if the new leaders in Congress try to roll back our nation's environmental protections or sell off our natural heritage, we will oppose them. And if the new House leaders seek to undermine the Obama administration's efforts to promote clean energy, limit carbon pollution, protect our air and water, and preserve our natural heritage, we will defend the administration's actions.

At any given moment, our progress can and often does seem frustratingly slow and elusive, and Tuesday's election results will undoubtedly present new and tough challenges for all of us.

Yet as Abraham Lincoln once said, "I walk slowly, but I never walk backwards." Thanks to you and millions of like-minded Americans, we've see tremendous positive changes on the environment over the last few decades. We still have a long way to go, but no single election is going to stop us.

Sincerely,
Dena Mottola Jaborska

Environment New Jersey Executive Director

http://www.environmentnewjersey.org/

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

A Job and Investment Killer | RenewablesBiz

Yesterday I forwarded a Renewable Biz article highlighting concerns expressed over a national renewable energy policy. I admitted some of the arguments against a national RES policy made me re-think my pro-position. At the risk of creating whiplash, after reading today's article , A Job and Investment Killer RenewablesBiz, I believe the merits for a national policy exceed the concerns expressed in yesterday's article.

Specifically, using California as an example, the most important benefit to RES legislation is that it provides the stability required to invest in technology and create jobs. California currently provides an estimated 500,000 clean-tech jobs. In a time of continued economic uncertainty, and high unemployment, this fact alone has significant merit. Further, the potential reversal of the Global Warming Solutions Act via Proposition 23 presents an excellent case for a national policy. Without a firm national policy, state policies are at risk by special interest groups. And, back to the top priorities expressed by senior energy executives on my earlier blog, a national policy would provide some certainty (aka strategic direction) during uncertain times. Once a national policy is established, as noted in this article, investors will have the confidence to invest in technologies and companies to allow for job creation, better products and services and, ultimately, better pricing.

Sounds like a win-win to me.

Best,

Paula

Monday, October 18, 2010

The Readers Say No RES | RenewablesBiz

Since beginning my sustainability/renewable energy journey, I have expressed interest in securing a national RES policy to help encourage sustained uptake in the use of renewable energy and to help prevent utility monopolies from influencing policy. As I came from the telecom industry and saw first-hand the benefits of competition (better products, lower costs, more choices) derived from divestiture, I thought the utility model would work in a similar fashion. Perhaps I was wrong.

After reading the following article in Renewable Biz, The Readers Say No RES RenewablesBiz, I think I was a bit naive in thinking a national policy would solve the renewable energy sector's woes.  This article presents some valid points about state/regional specific needs potentially being overlooked in a national policy. There's also the concern that some states (NJ for example!) have more aggressive policies than those proposed by the Fed. If a federal policy is enacted, does it then negate existing state policies? While consistency is needed to facilitate funding and create stability, what is really in the best interest of the consumer, our economy and our planet?

I don't know the answer right now, but I'll keep reading until I can find it out.

Best,

Paula

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

News on the Energy Front

I attended last week's 7th annual Women in Power forum to learn more about the energy sector and pending legislation affecting renewable energy. The forum was hosted by Patton Boggs, a large DC Headquartered lawfirm specializing in public policy,  The all-women event was attended by several senior-level executives in the power industry as well as influencial policy makers from FERC and the US senate. All-in-all, the women were very impressive in both their knowledge and commitment to service-excellence. While they came from various segments of the energy industry-traditional energy, wind, solar and policy-and diverse educational disciplines-science, law, business, engineering- many agreed on the top issues affecting their businesses.

The top concerns expressed at the meeting included:

1) Security-predominately cyber-security and it's real threat of having someone shut down their transmission networks.
2) Policy-National Policy will dictate funding/investment that will help pay for new technology, renewables and transmission upgrades.
3) Predictability-with with smart-grid technology and renewable energy evolving, and carbon emission reductions and energy policy pending,  the leaders are operating with a considerable amount of uncertainty. A national policy which stimultates funding will help off-set this uncertainty by allowing for investment in new technologies and fostering longer-term planning.
4) Affordable, Safe Storage for Renewable Energy-Wind energy is volitile, with high peaks that tax transmission networks and low valleys that are costly. Solar produces energy during the day, but not during rainy days or at night when residential consumers have peak demand. To address these needs, energy companies want affordable, safe storage solutions that can contain the energy produced during peak operation.

In reflecting upon the day, I realized the energy industry is at a cross-road. Traditional utilities are incorporating renewable energy into their "mix" of energy sources, but are concerned by their inconsistant production and costs. They need a national transmission grid that allows them to load and off-load energy based on regionalized (renewable) energy production. They also need a clear vision of our country's energy policy to allow for longer-term planning to help balance investment costs with service reliability.

Best,

Paula

To find out more about Women in Power please visit Patton Boggs site:

http://www.pattonboggs.com/womeninpower10/

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Defining sustainability

My hope in starting this blog is to provide practical advise, based on research and first-hand experience, to anyone who is interested in living a more balanced, sustainable life-style. Before starting, I thought it might be helpful to define sustainability, and it's core elements.

Best,

Paula

Wikipedia's Definition
Sustainability is the capacity to endure. In ecology the word describes how biological systems remain diverse and productive over time. For humans it is the potential for long-term maintenance of well being, which in turn depends on the maintenance of the natural world and natural resources.Ways of living more sustainably can take many forms from reorganising living conditions (e.g., ecovillages, eco-municipalities and sustainable cities), reappraising economic sectors (permaculture, green building,sustainable agriculture), or work practices (sustainable architecture), using science to develop new technologies (green technologies,renewable energy), to adjustments in individual lifestyles that conserve natural resources.

The Formal Definition-
The word sustainability is derived from the Latin sustinere (tenere, to hold; sus, up). Dictionaries provide more than ten meanings for sustain, the main ones being to “maintain", "support", or "endure”.[6][7] 

Sustainability's link with Sustainable Development-
Since the 1980s sustainability has been used more in the sense of human sustainability on planet Earth and this has resulted in the most widely quoted definition of sustainability and sustainable development, that of the Brundtland Commission of the United Nations on March 20, 1987:

 sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”[8]

2005 World Summit Definition

Sustainable development was noted to require the reconciliation of environmental,social and economic demands - the "three pillars" of sustainability.[10] This view has been expressed as an illustration using three overlapping ellipses indicating that the three pillars of sustainability are not mutually exclusive and can be mutually reinforcing.[11



Monday, August 9, 2010

Under Development-Please check back for helpful information on sustainable living.